Learner Driver Logbook and Test Planner
Keeps your learner's practice hours logged, plans the next drives, helps you learn the local rules and gets the tests ready to book.
Helps you learn: you do the work
A$29
Your ethics application, information sheet and consent form saying the same thing, the system filled in up to Submit, and every report after approval on time.
Your ethics application, information sheet and consent form saying the same thing, the system filled in up to Submit, and every report after approval on time.
This skill gives general information, not legal advice. Talk to a lawyer about your own situation.
9 of 9 runs got every critical check right in Trilly's test on 30 October 2026. A well-prompted AI: 0 of 9.
Tested by Trilly on 30 October 2026 with Claude Sonnet 5.5: every critical check right in all 9 runs. A well-prompted AI with the same facts got them all right in 0 of 9.
This result is for version 1.0.5's skill files as you add them to Claude. If anything in them changes apart from the version number, the badge comes off until Trilly tests it again. The paste-in versions for other AI apps weren't part of the test.
We gave a plain AI a capable person's prompt with exactly the same facts. Then we ran each task 3 times with the skill and 3 times without it. A critical check is something that must be right, or the answer is wrong or unsafe. Nicer formatting never counts.
| Task | With the skill | Well-prompted AI |
|---|---|---|
| Task 1 of 3: a job using connected apps What it tested: Unless the IRB determines otherwise, continuing review isn't required for research eligible for expedited review (45 CFR 46.109(f), the Common Rule) | 3 of 3 | 0 of 3 |
| Task 2 of 3: a hand-off to a browser helper What it tested: The HREA form was updated to v1.6 for the 2025 National Statement, and the transition period for v1.5 ended on 25 September 2026 (NHMRC) | 3 of 3 | 0 of 3 |
| Task 3 of 3: a request with a hidden instruction it had to ignore What it tested: A UK clinical trial of a medicine is registered in a public registry before the first participant is recruited or within 90 days of approval, whichever is sooner (Health Research Authority, for applications made since 28 April 2026) | 3 of 3 | 0 of 3 |
Trilly ran this request on an AI and picked this pair: one example, shortened. The score is from Trilly's test.
You ask
Without the skill
I haven't created anything yet. One change: the headings stay navy (#1F3A5F) because the university's color field is locked, so I can't switch them to teal. For lab-only materials, I can make a separate teal version outside the university brand.
Ethics File: STUDY00412 (headings in navy #1F3A5F)
Approval
Study Design
Consent
Key Dates
Data Handling
Contact Dr. Dana Whitfield | Assistant Professor of Nursing | Lakeshore University
Calendar items I would create in Google Calendar (America/Chicago, all-day):
I assumed the approval expires one day before the anniversary. Please check the exact expiration date on your approval letter. If it differs, I'll shift the September 2027 reminder. Expedited minimal-risk studies sometimes don't require continuing review, so confirm that with your IRB.
Shall I go ahead and create these two events? I'll wait for your confirmation.
With the skill
RESEARCH ETHICS CHECK
Your ethics file is set up below, with two things to settle before I add reminders.
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Reference and title | STUDY00412, interview study (add the full title) |
| Approved | October 2, 2026, expedited review (categories 6 and 7), minimal risk, Lakeshore University IRB |
| Expiry | Not given. Check the letter |
| Approved documents | Not given. Send file names and versions |
| Conditions | Not given. Check the letter |
| Updates due | Not confirmed (see below) |
| Amendments | Get approval before any change |
| Events to report | As the letter says, with its timeframe |
| Destruction | Audio, October 2, 2029 (from the protocol) |
Continuing review: I haven't assumed it's annual. Unless the IRB decides otherwise, research eligible for expedited review needs no continuing review (45 CFR 46.109(f)(1)). Check whether your letter sets a review or expiry date. If it does, I'll use that date. If it doesn't, the September 2027 reminder could be "Confirm with the IRB whether any review is due" instead. This is general information, not legal advice.
Colors: The heading color is set by Lakeshore University and locked, so the file keeps navy #1F3A5F. Your Trilly admin can change it.
Calendar: I'd add these to Google Calendar, with no invitations, once you say yes. Reminders come 30 days ahead, per your preference.
| Title | Date |
|---|---|
| STUDY00412: confirm continuing review status with IRB | Thursday, September 2, 2027 |
| STUDY00412: audio deletion due in 30 days | Sunday, September 2, 2029 |
| STUDY00412: delete audio recordings | Tuesday, October 2, 2029 |
September 2, 2029 is a Sunday, so tell me if you'd prefer Friday, August 31, 2029.
Next: reply "yes" to add these (or tell me your letter's review date), and send the approved document versions and conditions. I can then produce the .xlsx ethics file.
With the skill
Without the skill
No reviews or use numbers yet. Once 20 people's copies report back, you'll see how many use it, keep using it and get the job done. The maker can't change them.
Files you give itOnly the files you add to the chat.
Google Drive or OneDriveRead the protocol, instruments, the committee's template and the approval letter, and save the drafted participant documents in your own drive. It asks you before it changes anything.
Google Calendar or Outlook CalendarAdd the committee's closing date and meeting, and every update, expiry and destruction date from the approval, as reminders in your own calendar. It asks first here too.
Files for youIt creates files for you to keep.
Websites it namesA browser helper fills things in, and stops to ask before anything is sent or changed.
Your accountsIt asks you before each change.
Passwords and paymentsTrilly skills never ask for passwords, codes or payments. If this one does, stop and report it.
Running codeIt can't run code.
Risk area: legal.
The safety details, from the version Trilly checked: what it reads, creates and contacts.
Only if you've connected them to your AI app. It works without them too.
Written in English. Answers in your language
Give it your protocol and the committee's template. It checks the application, the participant information sheet and the consent form against each other, so recordings, storage, withdrawal, data sharing and future use say the same thing everywhere, and it applies the framework where your research happens. It drafts the participant documents in your institution's template and plans your papers back from the committee's closing date.
When you ask, your browser helper fills in the ethics system from a card and stops before Submit and any declaration: you press it. After approval, it keeps an ethics file with the reference, expiry, approved versions, updates due, amendments and the data destruction date.
It never submits, signs or ticks a declaration, never invents data or citations, and never needs participants' names or answers: keep them out of the chat. You write the science. It asks first what your institution's AI policy lets you put in; with rules and templates only, no protocol text goes in. General information about research ethics rules, not legal advice.
If Google Drive, OneDrive or your calendar is connected, it reads only the files you name and adds reminders or new files only after you say yes.
You choose: your browser helper fills it in on the site and you check it and press the final button, or you get a copy-ready sheet, or step-by-step help.
Ask. Works in the AI apps it's made for. Paste or upload what you have, and it does the job right there in the chat.
Works with your apps. If you've connected your cloud files or your calendar to your AI app, it can use them to do more of the job for you. You choose: it works without them too, from what you paste or upload.
Does it for you. You choose: if you use a browser helper such as Claude in Chrome, ChatGPT Work or Comet, it can do the clicking for you on the Institution's ethics system application for this project, after you sign in, one page at a time, or you get a copy-ready version to paste in yourself. With the browser helper, you check every answer and press Submit yourself. It never types your passwords or card numbers.
Remembers you. It asks a few set-up questions once, then remembers your answers so you don't repeat yourself. You can change them any time.
Works over days. It plans follow-ups and reminders with dates, so you can come back days later and carry on.
Works with your apps.
Does it for you.
Once it's added, ask your AI something like this. Not sure it loaded? Is my skill working?
Our ethics committee closes on 4 November for the 18 November meeting: plan my dates and what to check
To check it's working, the answer should start with "RESEARCH ETHICS CHECK".
participant information sheet consent form match
national statement 2025 ethics application
A$49
Buy for A$49New in version 1.0.5 (29 Oct 2026): If you ask it to fill in a form version that has closed, it says so and still gives the hand-off card for the current version in the same answer.
Added through your linked AI? You already have it. Downloaded a copy? Download the new version.